Vol 51, No 7 (2023)
ARTICLES
Efficacy and safety of negative wound pressure in the treatment of surgical complications after radical cystectomy: a retrospective cohort study
Abstract
Background: Negative pressure wound treatment (NPWT) is a relatively new, but promising method for management of surgical site infection (SSI). The literature data on the use of NPWT for complications in oncology surgery, and after radical cystectomy (RC) in particular, is scarce.
Aim: To evaluate the short-term results of NPWT dressings in the management of SSI after RC.
Materials and methods: We retrospectively analyzed data from 446 patients who had RC with various uroderivation types in the Department of Oncourology of the N. N. Petrov National Medical Research Center of Oncology from January 2012 to December 2021. A total of 62 cases of SSI emerging up to day 30 after RC were identified with complete data. Thirty six (36) cases of SSI were managed according to standard procedures, and 26 patients with SSI were treated with NPWT (VivanoTec® S 042) at constant negative pressure mode. The physical condition of the patients before RC was assessed according to the American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) classification, and the severity of the patient's condition at SSI diagnosis within APACHE II scale. The following parameters were also analyzed: body mass index, median number of days in the hospital, number of program wound sanitations (surgical debridement) or frequency of changing NPWT dressings, changes over time in C-reactive protein and leukocyte index of intoxication, and events of clinical interest (intestinal fistulas and lateralization of the median wound margins, hernias).
Results: Most cases of post-RC SSIs were identified in men (57/62, 91.93%). The standard management and NPWT study groups were well balanced for age, body mass index, and ASA physical status. The median time from the first surgical debridement of the wound to its closure was significantly shorter in the standard surgical management group: 4 days (0; 8.75) versus 8.5 days (3.25; 12.0) in the NPWT group (p = 0.026). However, this did not negatively affect the length of hospitalization (28.08 ± 12.80 and 30.03 ± 16.27 days, respectively, p = 0.599). The 30-day mortality rates were not significantly different between the groups (p = 0.137). In our series with NPWT dressings, there were no cases of intestinal fistulas in the early and late postoperative periods.
Conclusion: Negative pressure wound treatment is a safe and effective method of SSI management. It is not inferior to the generally accepted treatment standard with surgical wound debridement, staged sanitations or dressings. NPWT dressings allow for early primary muscular-fascial closure of the abdominal cavity and does not increase the duration of hospital stay, postoperative death rates and the risk of intestinal fistulas.
Safety assessment and determination of a maximally tolerated dose of an RAS-GTPase inhibitor (iRAS) in the treatment of gastrointestinal tumors: preliminary results of the phase I trial
Abstract
Background: Ras oncogene mutations leading to hyperactivation of the MAPK/ERK signaling pathway occur in 25% of all human tumors, and for gastrointestinal tumors, the frequency of Ras mutations amounts to 60%. The introduction of a Ras-GTPase inhibitor into clinical practice would increase the effectiveness of the treatment of socially significant diseases such as stomach and intestinal cancer.
Aim: To select the optimal dose with a subsequent assessment of the safety of iRAS when administered to patients with gastrointestinal tract tumors, including those with peritoneal carcinomatosis.
Materials and methods: This was a prospective open-label non-randomized phase I study for the assessment of safety and tolerability, with an adaptive design and determination of the maximally tolerated dose of the iRAS. Three dose levels were used (0.45 mg/kg, 0.9 mg/kg, 1.8 mg/kg) according to the "3 + 3" scheme. The study included 11 patients after surgery for stomach or colorectal cancer. The patients were administered PIPAC therapy with iRAS twice with a 7-days interval. The study duration was 28 ± 1 days. During the study, the patient monitoring included physical examination, assessment of vital signs, electrocardiography and echocardiography, laboratory parameters (hematology, clinical chemistry, coagulation tests, and urine analysis).
Results: The anti-tumor iRAS agent demonstrated satisfactory tolerability of all doses studied, including the maximal 1.8 mg/kg dose. Vital sign and laboratory abnormalities were clinically non-significant and did not require additional therapeutic interventions. Statistically significant abnormalities were registered for total protein (p = 0.00028), white blood cell counts (p = 0.007), lymphocyte counts (p = 0.0008), and a number of other blood parameters; however, most of these abnormalities were within the physiological normal ranges. Vital signs such as electrocardiography and echocardiography parameters remained stable throughout the entire follow-up period (28 days after administration of the drug). There were short-term rises in body temperature, minor pains in the postoperative scar area.
Conclusion: This trial of safety and tolerability of iRAS showed that no cases of dose-limiting toxicity in the studied dose range. The 1.8 mg/kg dose can be recommended for further clinical studies.
REVIEW ARTICLE
Resistance to dopamine agonists in the treatment of prolactinomas: diagnostic criteria, mechanisms and ways to overcome it
Abstract
The priority treatment approach for prolactinomas is therapy with dopamine agonists, which allows for elimination of clinical symptoms, normalization of prolactin levels, reduction of the adenoma size and prevention of metabolic abnormalities in the majority of patients. Nevertheless, 10 to 20% of patients are resistant to dopamine agonists. The aim of this review is to analyze literature data on the source mechanisms and potential ways to overcome the resistance of prolactinomas to dopamine agonists. The criteria of a prolactinoma's resistance to dopamine agonists are as follows: 1) no normalization of serum prolactin levels and/or 2) no reduction of the adenoma volume by at least 50% after treatment of bromocriptine at a dose of ≤ 15 mg/day or cabergoline at a dose of ≤ 3 mg/week for at least 6 months. Full resistance is characterized by both no biochemical and no anti-tumor effects, whereas in partial resistance, prolactin levels can be decreased but not normalized, or the adenoma size can be reduced by less than 50% of the initial. The clinical and morphological predictors of prolactinoma resistance to dopamine agonists are male gender, young age, big size of the adenoma and its invasion into the sinus cavernosus, hypointensive and/or heterogeneous MRI signal on Т2 weighed images, and cystic components within the tumor. The main molecular genetic markers are: decreased expression of dopamine and estrogen receptors, higher proliferation index Ki-67 ≤ 3%, as well as the MENIN, AIP, SF3B1, PRDM2 gene mutations. In case of resistance to bromocriptine, it is recommended to switch the patient to cabergoline. In partial resistance to standard doses of cabergoline, it is possible to increase the dose up to a maximally tolerated. Neurosurgery and/or radiation surgery is recommended in cases of full resistance to dopamine agonists or an aggressive tumor. For very aggressive/malignant tumors, or in the event of their extended growth after surgery, temozolomide is recommended as adjuvant therapy.
CLINICAL CASES
The clinical case of a combination of ankylosing spondylitis, ulcerative colitis and rheumatoid arthritis in one patient: where is the intersection point?
Abstract
We describe a clinical observation of a 64-year old Caucasian patient with a longstanding ankylosing spondylitis, who was admitted to the clinic for diarrhea and joint syndrome. Physical and X-ray examination showed that his musculoskeletal system disorder was represented by ankylosing spondylitis, symmetrical erosive polyarthritis of the metacarpophalangeal joints, and wrist joint ankylosis. Laboratory work-up identified that the patient was HLA-B27 positive, had high rheumatoid factor and anti-citrulline antibodies levels. At colonoscopy, there were signs of ulcerative colitis. After the differential diagnosis procedures, we were able to conclude that the patient had a combination of rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, and ulcerative colitis as three independent but associated disorders. The first description of these three autoimmune diseases in one patient can be of interest for clinicians.
Lichenoid and psoriasiform drug induced rush during imatinib therapy: a clinical case
Abstract
Tyrosine kinase inhibitor imatinib is a standard agent for treatment of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST). Treatment courses are quite long and are usually well tolerated. However, skin rash can occur on treatment, with a prevalence of 7 to 88.9%. We describe a clinical case of a patient with GIST, who has been on treatment with imatinib at daily dose of 400 mg for one year. Several weeks from the treatment initiation, she had facial edema, and 4 months thereafter psoriasiform rash appeared which was initially considered to be psoriatic. After 8 months, the patient had lichenoid rash on the inguinal skin and oral, tongue and vulvar mucosae. Clinically, the lichenoid rash was similar with lichen ruber planus. To confirm the diagnosis, we performed biopsy of psoriasiform and lichenoid foci. Histological examination verified the drug-induced rash. Topical treatment of psoriasiform rash with glucocorticosteroids resulted in regression of some plaques, although a proportion of them persisted. Inguinal and vulvar lichenoid rashes completely regressed and numbers of oral and tongue foci decreased after a 6-week daily application of the 0.1% tacrolimus cream. Treatment with imatinib 400 mg daily was not interrupted. The clinical observation illustrates the possibility of skin and mucosal lichenoid and psoriasiform rash simultaneously during treatment with imatinib and demonstrates the first successful experience in the treatment of lichenoid rashes with 0.1% tacrolimus cream.