Anatomical and ultrasound navigation of intra joint injections

Cover Page


Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

Optimization of joint syndrome treatment methods, including those based on the intra- and periarticular drug administration and invasive diagnostic techniques, remains high on the agenda of modern clinical rheumatology. The implementation and quite widely spread use of ultrasonographic visualization has been an impetus to the development of this type of treatment for joint diseases. Without any doubt, the quality of intraarticular injection performance mainly depends on the professional level of the specialist and his/hers procedural skills. However, here comes a predictable question: are these conditions sufficient to enable maximal precision, safety, and efficacy of intraarticular interventions? From this perspective, it is interesting to study the possibilities to improve the results of local treatments for the joint syndrome by means of the ultrasound navigation technique. Based on data presented in the literature review, we compared a “blind” invasive treatment method to the ultrasound navigation-guided intra- and periarticular interventions in patients with skeletomuscular and connective tissue disorders. The authors of the studies published point to higher safety, efficacy, procedure precision, and diagnostic quality of the information obtained by the ultrasound navigation. Its important advantages include wider possibilities and availability of this method in outpatient settings, due to its rather low costs and patients' safety. The information from the current literature review reflects an initial stage of studies on the evaluation of the role, significance, determination of potential of the ultrasound navigation to enhance the quality of diagnosis and invasive treatment in patients with joint syndromes of various origins and to minimize adverse effects.

About the authors

L. A. Knyazeva

Kursk State Medical University

Author for correspondence.
Email: kafedra_n1@bk.ru

Larisa A. Knyazeva – MD, PhD, Professor of the Department of Internal Diseases No. 1

3 K. Marksa ul., Kursk, 305041

Россия

N. Damjanov

University of Belgrade

Email: fake@neicon.ru

Nemanja Damjanov – MD, PhD, Professor of the Department of Internal Medicine; Director, Institute of Rheumatology, School of Medicine

1 Studentski trg, Belgrade, 11000

L. I. Knyazeva

Kursk State Medical University

Email: fake@neicon.ru

Larisa I. Knyazeva – MD, PhD, Professor, Head of the Department of Internal Diseases No. 1

3 K. Marksa ul., Kursk, 305041

Россия

E. M. Khardikova

Kursk State Medical University

Email: fake@neicon.ru

Elena M. Khardikova – MD, PhD, Associate Professor, Department of Internal Diseases No. 1

3 K. Marksa ul., Kursk, 305041

Россия

N. S. Meshcherina

Kursk State Medical University

Email: fake@neicon.ru

Natalia S. Meshcherina – MD, PhD, Associate Professor, Department of Internal Diseases No. 1

3 K. Marksa ul., Kursk, 305041

Россия

M. A. Stepchenko

Kursk State Medical University

Email: fake@neicon.ru

Marina A. Stepchenko – MD, PhD, Professor of the Department of Internal Diseases No. 1

3 K. Marksa ul., Kursk, 305041

Россия

I. I. Goryainov

Kursk State Medical University

Email: fake@neicon.ru

Igor I. Goryainov – MD, PhD, Professor of the Department of Internal Diseases No. 1

3 K. Marksa ul., Kursk, 305041

Россия

References

  1. Насонов ЕЛ, ред. Ревматология. Российские клинические рекомендации. М.: ГЭОТАРМедиа; 2017. 464 с.
  2. Mendonca JA, de Andrade BB, de Aquino JLB, Leandro-Merhi VA, Damian GB. Spectral Doppler and automated software-guided ultrasound assessment of bilateral common carotid intima-media thickness in spondyloarthritis: is there a correlation with clinical findings? Drugs Context. 2018;7:212538. doi: 10.7573/dic.212538.
  3. Backhaus M, Sandrock D, Schmidt WA. Imaging in rheumatology. Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2002;127(37): 1897–903. doi: 10.1055/s-200234064.
  4. Cecen GS, Gulabi D, Saglam F, Tanju NU, Bekler HI. Corticosteroid injection for trigger finger: blinded or ultrasound-guided injection? Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2015;135(1): 125–31. doi: 10.1007/s00402-014-2110-9.
  5. Daley EL, Bajaj S, Bisson LJ, Cole BJ. Improving injection accuracy of the elbow, knee, and shoulder: does injection site and imaging make a difference? A systematic review. Am J Sports Med. 2011;39(3): 656–62. doi: 10.1177/0363546510390610.
  6. Gruson KI, Ruchelsman DE, Zuckerman JD. Subacromial corticosteroid injections. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2008;17(1 Suppl):S118–30. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2007.07.009.
  7. Berkoff DJ, Miller LE, Block JE. Clinical utility of ultrasound guidance for intra-articular knee injections: a review. Clin Interv Aging. 2012;7:89–95. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S29265.
  8. Balint PV, Kane D, Hunter J, McInnes IB, Field M, Sturrock RD. Ultrasound guided versus conventional joint and soft tissue fluid aspiration in rheumatology practice: a pilot study. J Rheumatol. 2002;29(10): 2209–13.
  9. Bisbinas I, Belthur M, Said HG, Green M, Learmonth DJ. Accuracy of needle placement in ACJ injections. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2006;14(8): 762–5. doi: 10.1007/s00167006-0038-5.
  10. Bum Park Y, Ah Choi W, Kim YK, Chul Lee S, Hae Lee J. Accuracy of blind versus ultrasoundguided suprapatellar bursal injection. J Clin Ultrasound. 2012;40(1): 20–5. doi: 10.1002/jcu.20890.
  11. Cunnington J, Marshall N, Hide G, Bracewell C, Isaacs J, Platt P, Kane D. A randomized, doubleblind, controlled study of ultrasound-guided corticosteroid injection into the joint of patients with inflammatory arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2010;62(7): 1862–9. doi: 10.1002/art.27448.
  12. Sibbitt WL Jr, Peisajovich A, Michael AA, Park KS, Sibbitt RR, Band PA, Bankhurst AD. Does sonographic needle guidance affect the clinical outcome of intraarticular injections? J Rheumatol. 2009;36(9): 1892–902. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.090013.
  13. Ucuncu F, Capkin E, Karkucak M, Ozden G, Cakirbay H, Tosun M, Guler M. A comparison of the effectiveness of landmark-guided injections and ultrasonography guided injections for shoulder pain. Clin J Pain. 2009;25(9): 786–9. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e3181acb0e4.
  14. Zufferey P, Revaz S, Degailler X, Balague F, So A. A controlled trial of the benefits of ultrasoundguided steroid injection for shoulder pain. Joint Bone Spine. 2012;79(2): 166–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jbspin.2011.04.001.
  15. Bookman JS, Pereira DS. Ultrasound guidance for intra-articular knee and shoulder injections: a review. Bull Hosp Jt Dis (2013). 2014;72(4): 266–70.
  16. Im SH, Lee SC, Park YB, Cho SR, Kim JC. Feasibility of sonography for intra-articular injections in the knee through a medial patellar portal. J Ultrasound Med. 2009;28(11): 1465–70. doi: 10.7863/jum.2009.28.11.1465.
  17. Park Y, Lee SC, Nam HS, Lee J, Nam SH. Comparison of sonographically guided intra-articular injections at 3 different sites of the knee. J Ultrasound Med. 2011;30(12): 1669–76. doi: 10.7863/jum.2011.30.12.1669.
  18. Bum Park Y, Ah Choi W, Kim YK, Chul Lee S, Hae Lee J. Accuracy of blind versus ultrasoundguided suprapatellar bursal injection. J Clin Ultrasound. 2012;40(1): 20–5. doi: 10.1002/jcu.20890.
  19. Naredo E, Cabero F, Beneyto P, Cruz A, Mondejar B, Uson J, Palop MJ, Crespo M. A randomized comparative study of short term response to blind injection versus sonographic-guided injection of local corticosteroids in patients with painful shoulder. J Rheumatol. 2004;31(2): 308–14.
  20. Dogu B, Yucel SD, Sag SY, Bankaoglu M, Kuran B. Blind or ultrasound-guided corticosteroid injections and short-term response in subacromial impingement syndrome: a randomized, double-blind, prospective study. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2012;91(8): 658–65. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0b013e318255978a.
  21. Rutten MJ, Maresch BJ, Jager GJ, de Waal Malefijt MC. Injection of the subacromial-subdeltoid bursa: blind or ultrasound-guided? Acta Orthop. 2007;78(2): 254–7. doi: 10.1080/17453670710013762.
  22. Maricar N, Parkes MJ, Callaghan MJ, Felson DT, O'Neill TW. Where and how to inject the knee – a systematic review. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2013;43(2): 195–203. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2013.04.010.
  23. Raza K, Lee CY, Pilling D, Heaton S, Situnayake RD, Carruthers DM, Buckley CD, Gordon C, Salmon M. Ultrasound guidance allows accurate needle placement and aspiration from small joints in patients with early inflammatory arthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2003;42(8): 976–9. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keg269.
  24. Champs B, Corre P, Hamel A, Laffite CD, Le Goff B. US-guided temporomandibular joint injection: Validation of an in-plane longitudinal approach. J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019;120(1): 67–70. doi: 10.1016/j.jormas.2018.10.008.
  25. Koh SH, Lee SC, Lee WY, Kim J, Park Y. Ultrasoundguided intra-articular injection of hyaluronic acid and ketorolac for osteoarthritis of the carpometacarpal joint of the thumb: A retrospective comparative study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2019;98(19):e15506. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000015506.
  26. Hashemi SM, Hosseini B, Zhand M, Pourrosta R. Accuracy of ultrasound guided versus blind knee intra-articular injection for knee osteoarthritis prolotherapy. J Anesth Crit Care Open Access. 2016;5(2): 00181. doi: 10.15406/jaccoa.2016.05.00181.
  27. Jang SH, Lee SC, Lee JH, Nam SH, Cho KR, Park Y. Comparison of ultrasound (US)-guided intra-articular injections by in-plain and outofplain on medial portal of the knee. Rheumatol Int. 2013;33(8): 1951–9. doi: 10.1007/s00296-012-2660-5.
  28. Sibbitt WL Jr, Kettwich LG, Band PA, Chavez-Chiang NR, DeLea SL, Haseler LJ, Bankhurst AD. Does ultrasound guidance improve the outcomes of arthrocentesis and corticosteroid injection of the knee? Scand J Rheumatol. 2012;41(1): 66–72. doi: 10.3109/03009742.2011.599071.
  29. Risler Z, Magee MA, Mazza JM, Goodsell K, Au AK, Lewiss RE, Pugliese RS, Ku B. A three-dimensional printed low-cost anterior shoulder dislocation model for ultrasound-guided injection training. Cureus. 2018;10(11):e3536. doi: 10.7759/cureus.3536.
  30. Orlandi D, Ferrero G, Fabbro E, Martini C, Sconfienza LM, Silvestri E; Genoa/IT, Genova/IT, Donato S, Milanese/IT. Ultrasound (US) guided interventional procedures around the hand and the wrist. Scientific Exhibit. ESSR 2013. P-0034. doi: 10.1594/essr2013/P-0034.
  31. El Miedany Y. Musculoskeletal US: examining the joints. Br J Nurs. 2012;21(6): 340–4. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2012.21.6.340.
  32. Gigante A, Callegari L. The role of intra-articular hyaluronan (Sinovial) in the treatment of osteoarthritis. Rheumatol Int. 2011;31(4): 427– 44. doi: 10.1007/s00296-010-1660-6.
  33. Karaahmet OZ, Gurcay E, Kara M, Serce A, Kırac Unal Z, Cakcı A. Comparing the effectiveness of ultrasound-guided versus blind steroid injection in the treatment of severe carpal tunnel syndrome. Turk J Med Sci. 2017;47(6): 1785–90. doi: 10.3906/sag-1704-97.
  34. Danielsen MA. Ultrasonography for diagnosis, monitoring and treatment of tenosynovitis in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Dan Med J. 2018;65(3). pii: B5474.
  35. Hargreaves BA, Gold GE, Lang PK, Conolly SM, Pauly JM, Bergman G, Vandevenne J, Nishimura DG. MR imaging of articular cartilage using driven equilibrium. Magn Reson Med. 1999;42(4): 695–703. doi: 10.1002/ (sici)1522-2594(199910)42:4<695::aidmrm11> 3.0.co;2-z.
  36. Curtiss HM, Finnoff JT, Peck E, Hollman J, Muir J, Smith J. Accuracy of ultrasound-guided and palpation-guided knee injections by an experienced and less-experienced injector using a superolateral approach: a cadaveric study. PM R. 2011;3(6): 507–15. doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2011.02.020.
  37. Li Z, Xia C, Yu A, Qi B. Ultrasound-versus palpationguided injection of corticosteroid for plantar fasciitis: a meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2014;9(3):e92671. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0092671.
  38. Jackson DW, Evans NA, Thomas BM. Accuracy of needle placement into the intra-articular space of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002;84(9): 1522–7. doi: 10.2106/00004623200209000-00003.
  39. Jones A, Regan M, Ledingham J, Pattrick M, Manhire A, Doherty M. Importance of placement of intra-articular steroid injections. BMJ. 1993;307(6915): 1329–30. doi: 10.1136/bmj.307.6915.1329.
  40. Sofka CM, Collins AJ, Adler RS. Use of ultrasonographic guidance in interventional musculoskeletal procedures: a review from a single institution. J Ultrasound Med. 2001;20(1): 21–6. doi: 10.7863/jum.2001.20.1.21.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download

Copyright (c) 2019 Knyazeva L.A., Damjanov N., Knyazeva L.I., Khardikova E.M., Meshcherina N.S., Stepchenko M.A., Goryainov I.I.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies