Myocardial revascularization in the beating heart without cardiopulmonary bypass in elderly patients with ischemic heart disease

Cover Page


Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

Rationale: Ageing of population results in an increase in number of aortocoronary bypass interventions in patients with ischemic heart disease aged 65 years and above. This patient group has an increased risk of complications related to systemic inflammatory response to surgical revascularization of the myocardium by on- pump coronary artery bypass (ONCAB). The off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) enables to avoid complications related to cardiopulmonary bypass; however, there is no consensus on this technique and no clinical guidelines have been developed.

Aim: To evaluate short-term results of surgical treatment of elderly patients with ischemic heart disease after OPCAB and after ONCAB.

Materials and methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of 61 patients aged above 60 years with multivessel coronary artery disease. The patients from group 1 (n = 31, mean age 72.2 ± 7.3 years) underwent OPCAB, whereas the patients from group 2 (n = 30, mean age 69.3 ± 7.7 years) underwent ONCAB and pharmaco-cold cardioplegia.

Results: In the patient group who had underwent OPCAB, there was a significant decrease in the duration of the surgery (4.15 ± 1.2 vs 4.53 ± 1.3 h, p < 0.05), reduction of the duration of mechanical ventilation (11.8 ± 2.3 vs 15.3 ± 1.4 h, p < 0.05), and the number of the transfused RBC doses (0.36 ± 0.9 vs 2.5 ± 1.1 U, p < 0.05). In the early postoperative period, there was a significant difference in the blood loss volume within the 1st day (280 ± 190 mL in group 1 and 359 ± 270 mL in group 2, p < 0.05). The group 1 patients showed a reduction in frequency of heart arrhythmia (4 (12.9%) vs 11 (36.5%) patients, p < 0.05), shorter duration of stay in the resuscitation unit (1.09 ± 0.3 vs 1.46 ± 0.8 days, p < 0.05) and in the department of cardiac surgery (5.06 ± 0.8 vs 7.3 ± 1.1 days, p < 0.05).

Conclusion: In the elderly patients, OPCAB could be the intervention of choice allowing for an improvement of short-term postoperative outcomes.

About the authors

E. V. Tkachev

Burdenko Main Military Clinical Hospital

Email: fake@neicon.ru

MD, PhD, Head of the Department of Cardiovascular Surgery

3 Gospital'naya ploshchad', Moscow, 105229, Russian Federation

Russian Federation

P. V. Kleshchev

Burdenko Main Military Clinical Hospital

Author for correspondence.
Email: kleshevpavel@gmail.com

MD, Cardiovascular Surgeon, Department of Cardiovascular Surgery

3 Gospital'naya ploshchad', Moscow, 105229, Russian Federation. Tel.: +7 (926) 383 00 53

Russian Federation

D. V. Vinogradov

Burdenko Main Military Clinical Hospital

Email: fake@neicon.ru

MD, Head of Department of Artificial Blood Circulation

3 Gospital'naya ploshchad', Moscow, 105229, Russian Federation

Russian Federation

Yu. V. Khrenov

Burdenko Main Military Clinical Hospital

Email: fake@neicon.ru

MD, Anesthesiologist

3 Gospital'naya ploshchad', Moscow, 105229, Russian Federation

Russian Federation

S. V. D'yakov

Burdenko Main Military Clinical Hospital

Email: fake@neicon.ru

MD, Perfusiologist, Department of Artificial Blood Circulation

3 Gospital'naya ploshchad', Moscow, 105229, Russian Federation

Russian Federation

K. Yu. Berezhnoy

Moscow City Clinical Hospital No. 52

Email: fake@neicon.ru

Specialist in Radiological Endovascular Surgery, Department of Radiological Endovascular Diagnostics and Treatment

3 Pekhotnaya ul., Moscow, 123182, Russian Federation

Russian Federation

References

  1. Lloyd-Jones D, Adams RJ, Brown TM, Carnethon M, Dai S, De Simone G, Ferguson TB, Ford E, Furie K, Gillespie C, Go A, Greenlund K, Haase N, Hailpern S, Ho PM, Howard V, Kissela B, Kittner S, Lackland D, Lisabeth L, Marelli A, McDermott MM, Meigs J, Mozaffarian D, Mussolino M, Nichol G, Roger VL, Rosamond W, Sacco R, Sorlie P, Stafford R, Thom T, Wasserthiel-Smoller S, Wong ND, Wylie-Rosett J; American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Executive summary: heart disease and stroke statistics – 2010 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2010;121(7): 948–54. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.192666.
  2. Nichols M, Townsend N, Scarborough P, Rayner M. Cardiovascular disease in Europe 2014: epidemiological update. Eur Heart J. 2014;35(42): 2950–9. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehu299.
  3. Stone GW, Sabik JF, Serruys PW, Simonton CA, Généreux P, Puskas J, Kandzari DE, Morice MC, Lembo N, Brown WM 3rd, Taggart DP, Banning A, Merkely B, Horkay F, Boonstra PW, van Boven AJ, Ungi I, Bogáts G, Mansour S, Noiseux N, Sabaté M, Pomar J, Hickey M, Gershlick A, Buszman P, Bochenek A, Schampaert E, Pagé P, Dressler O, Kosmidou I, Mehran R, Pocock SJ, Kappetein AP; EXCEL Trial Investigators. Everolimus-Eluting Stents or Bypass Surgery for Left Main Coronary Artery Disease. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(23): 2223–35. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1610227.
  4. Mäkikallio T, Holm NR, Lindsay M, Spence MS, Erglis A, Menown IB, Trovik T, Eskola M, Romppanen H, Kellerth T, Ravkilde J, Jensen LO, Kalinauskas G, Linder RB, Pentikainen M, Hervold A, Banning A, Zaman A, Cotton J, Eriksen E, Margus S, Sørensen HT, Nielsen PH, Niemelä M, Kervinen K, Lassen JF, Maeng M, Oldroyd K, Berg G, Walsh SJ, Hanratty CG, Kumsars I, Stradins P, Steigen TK, Fröbert O, Graham AN, Endresen PC, Corbascio M, Kajander O, Trivedi U, Hartikainen J, Anttila V, Hildick-Smith D, Thuesen L, Christiansen EH; NOBLE study investigators. Percutaneous coronary angioplasty versus coronary artery bypass grafting in treatment of unprotected left main stenosis (NOBLE): a prospective, randomised, open-label, non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2016;388(10061): 2743–52. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)32052-9.
  5. Committee for Scientific Affairs, The Japanese Association for Thoracic Surgery, Masuda M,Kuwano H, Okumura M, Amano J, Arai H, Endo S, Doki Y, Kobayashi J, Motomura N, Nishida H, Saiki Y, Tanaka F, Tanemoto K, Toh Y, Yokomise H. Thoracic and cardiovascular surgery in Japan during 2012: annual report by The Japanese Association for Thoracic Surgery. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014;62(12): 734– 64. doi: 10.1007/s11748-014-0464-0.
  6. Dalén M, Ivert T, Holzmann MJ, Sartipy U. Coronary artery bypass grafting in patients 50 years or younger: a Swedish nationwide cohort study. Circulation. 2015;131(20): 1748–54. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.014335.
  7. Saito A, Motomura N, Miyata H, Takamoto S, Kyo S, Ono M; Japan Cardiovascular Surgery Database Organization. Age-specific risk stratification in 13488 isolated coronary artery bypass grafting procedures. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2011;12(4): 575–80. doi: 10.1510/icvts.2010.254813.
  8. Torikai K, Narita N, Matsuda T, Tohyo Y, Miyake F, Narita M, Imamura S, Sugimori H. A comparative study of health checkup results between early and late elderly. Gen Med. 2011;12:11–8. doi: 10.14442/general.12.11.
  9. Бокерия ЛА, Гордеев МЛ, Авалиани ВМ. Аортокоронарное шунтирование на работающем сердце: современный взгляд на проблему. Грудная и сердечно- сосудистая хирургия. 2013;(4): 4–15.
  10. Gao L, Taha R, Gauvin D, Othmen LB, Wang Y, Blaise G. Postoperative cognitive dysfunction after cardiac surgery. Chest. 2005;128(5): 3664– 70. doi: 10.1378/chest.128.5.3664.
  11. Auer J, Weber T, Berent R, Ng CK, Lamm G, Eber B. Risk factors of postoperative atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery. J Card Surg. 2005;20(5): 425–31. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8191.2005.2004123.x.
  12. Rodriguez F, Nguyen TC, Galanko JA, Morton J. Gastrointestinal complications after coronary artery bypass grafting: a national study of morbidity and mortality predictors. J Am Coll Surg. 2007;205(6): 741–7. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg. 2007.07.003.
  13. Magee MJ, Coombs LP, Peterson ED, Mack MJ. Patient selection and current practice strategy for off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery. Circulation. 2003;108 Suppl 1:II9–14. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.0000089187.51855.77.
  14. Bakaeen FG, Chu D, Kelly RF, Holman WL, Jessen ME, Ward HB. Perioperative outcomes after on- and off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. Tex Heart Inst J. 2014;41(2): 144– 51. doi: 10.14503/THIJ-13-3372.
  15. Panesar SS, Athanasiou T, Nair S, Rao C, Jones C, Nicolaou M, Darzi A. Early outcomes in the elderly: a meta-analysis of 4921 patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting – comparison between off-pump and on-pump techniques. Heart. 2006;92(12): 1808–16. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2006.088450.
  16. Emmert MY, Salzberg SP, Seifert B, Rodriguez H, Plass A, Hoerstrup SP, Grünenfelder J, Falk V. Is off-pump superior to conventional coronary artery bypass grafting in diabetic patients with multivessel disease? Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2011;40(1): 233–9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2010.11.003.
  17. Takase S, Yokoyama H, Satokawa H, Sato Y, Kurosawa H, Seto Y, Kagoshima A, Igarashi T. Short-term and long-term outcomes of octogenarians after off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010;58(11): 561–7. doi: 10.1007/s11748-010-0640-9.
  18. Vasques F, Rainio A, Heikkinen J, Mikkola R, Lahtinen J, Kettunen U, Juvonen T, Biancari F. Off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass surgery in patients aged 80 years and older: institutional results and meta-analysis. Heart Vessels. 2013;28(1): 46–56. doi: 10.1007/s00380-011-0200-y.
  19. Kuss O, Börgermann J. Do higher-risk patients benefit from off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting? Evidence from an ecologic analysis of randomized trials. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2011;142(3):e117–22. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2011.04.032.
  20. Hu S, Zheng Z, Yuan X, Wang W, Song Y, Sun H, Xu J. Increasing long-term major vascular events and resource consumption in patients receiving off-pump coronary artery bypass: a single-center prospective observational study. Circulation. 2010;121(16): 1800–8. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.894543.
  21. Diegeler A, Börgermann J, Kappert U, Breuer M, Böning A, Ursulescu A, Rastan A, Holzhey D, Treede H, Rieß FC, Veeckmann P, Asfoor A, Reents W, Zacher M, Hilker M; GOPCABE Study Group. Off-pump versus on-pump coronary- artery bypass grafting in elderly patients. N Engl J Med. 2013;368(13): 1189–98. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1211666.
  22. Lemma MG, Coscioni E, Tritto FP, Centofanti P, Fondacone C, Salica A, Rossi A, De Santo T, Di Benedetto G, Piazza L, Rinaldi M, Schinosa AL, De Paulis R, Contino M, Genoni M. Onpump versus off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery in high-risk patients: operative results of a prospective randomized trial (on-off study). J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012;143(3): 625–31. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2011.11.011.
  23. Shroyer AL, Grover FL, Hattler B, Collins JF, McDonald GO, Kozora E, Lucke JC, Baltz JH, Novitzky D; Veterans Affairs Randomized On/ Off Bypass (ROOBY) Study Group. On-pump versus off-pump coronary-artery bypass surgery. N Engl J Med. 2009;361(19): 1827–37. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0902905.
  24. Lamy A, Devereaux PJ, Prabhakaran D, Taggart DP, Hu S, Straka Z, Piegas LS, Avezum A, Akar AR, Lanas Zanetti F, Jain AR, Noiseux N, Padmanabhan C, Bahamondes JC, Novick RJ, Tao L, Olavegogeascoechea PA, Airan B, Sulling TA, Whitlock RP, Ou Y, Gao P, Pettit S, Yusuf S; CORONARY Investigators. Five-Year Outcomes after Off-Pump or On-Pump Coronary- Artery Bypass Grafting. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(24): 2359–68. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1601564.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download

Copyright (c) 2017 Tkachev E.V., Kleshchev P.V., Vinogradov D.V., Khrenov Y.V., D'yakov S.V., Berezhnoy K.Y.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies