Email this article VISUAL OUTCOMES OF IMPLANTATION OF MULTIFOCAL INTRAOCULAR LENS WITH ASYMMETRICAL LIGHT DISTRIBUTION
- Authors: Mityaeva E.N.1, Loskutov I.A.2
-
Affiliations:
- Mytishchi City Clinical Hospital
- Eye Microsurgery Center of the Non-Governmental Healthcare Institution “N.A. Semashko Railroad Hospital”
- Issue: No 36 (2015)
- Pages: 34-36
- Section: SURGICAL TREATMENT OF OPHTHALMOPATHY
- URL: https://almclinmed.ru/jour/article/view/213
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.18786/2072-0505-2015-36-34-36
- ID: 213
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
Background: The results of implantation of refractive intraocular lenses (IOL), especially with an inferior segmental near add are of great interest due to advantages of the new lenses over more frequently used diffractive multifocal IOL.
Aim: To assess the ocular optical performance of eyes implanted with a new IOL Lentis Mplus.
Materials and methods: 78 patients (100 eyes) aged > 50 years were implanted with 100 IOLs Lentis Mplus. Preoperative examination included measuring uncorrected and corrected distance visual acuity, uncorrected and corrected near visual acuity. Postoperatively, uncorrected and corrected distance visual acuity, uncorrected and corrected near visual acuity (distance 33 cm) were estimated along with intermediate vision measurement using near-vision charts (60 cm).
Results: On the day 3 after the procedure, distance visual acuity was good, and patients were able to near-reading of medium-size fonts. In 1 year, uncorrected visual acuity was 0.8–1.0 in two thirds of patients. 25% of patients needed distance visual correction from (-)0.5 to (-)0.75 D. Corrected visual acuity improved to 0.9–1.0. In 1 year, near visual acuity was 0.5 or more and intermediate visual acuity was 0.4 or more in all patients. In 78% of patients, 60 cm visual acuity was 0.5.
Conclusion: Implantation of multifocal IOL Lentis Mplus produced good distance visual acuity and satisfactory (working) near and intermediate visual performance.
About the authors
E. N. Mityaeva
Mytishchi City Clinical Hospital
Author for correspondence.
Email: mityaevadoc@mail.ru
Ophthalmologist, the Head of the Ophthalmology Department
РоссияI. A. Loskutov
Eye Microsurgery Center of the Non-Governmental Healthcare Institution “N.A. Semashko Railroad Hospital”
Email: fake@neicon.ru
MD, PhD, Chief Россия
References
- Alio JL, Tavolato M, De la Hoz F, Claramonte P, Rodriguez-Prats JL, Galal A. Near vision restoration with refractive lens exchange and pseudoaccommodating and multifocal refractive and diffractive intraocular lenses: comparative clinical study. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004;30(12):2494–503.
- Montes-Mico R, Alio JL. Distance and near contrast sensitivity function after multifocal intraocular lens implantation. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003;29(4):703–11.
- Javitt JC, Steinert RF. Cataract extraction with multifocal intraocular lens implantation: a multinational clinical trial evaluating clinical, functional, and quality-of-life outcomes. Ophthalmology. 2000;107(11):2040–8.
- Busacca A. Physiology of the ciliary muscle as studied by gonioscopy. Ann Ocul (Paris). 1955;188(1):1–19.
- Coleman DJ. On the hydraulic suspension theory of accommodation. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 1986;84:846–68.
- Findl O, Leydolt C. Meta-analysis of accommodating intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2007;33(3):522–7.
- Glasser A. Restoration of accommodation. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2006;17(1):12–8.
- Alfonso JF, Puchades C, Fernandez-Vega L, Montes-Mico R, Valcarcel B, Ferrer-Blasco T. Visual acuity comparison of 2 models of bifocal aspheric intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009;35(4):672–6.
- Alio JL, Elkady B, Ortiz D, Bernabeu G. Clinical outcomes and intraocular optical quality of a diffractive multifocal intraocular lens with asymmetrical light distribution. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008;34(6):942–8.
Supplementary files
