CHARACTERISTICS OF MACULAR REGION AND VISUAL ACUITY IN GLAUCOMA PATIENTS AFTER PHACOEMULSIFICATION CATARACT SURGERY

Cover Page


Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

Background: To improve safety of phacoemulsification cataract surgery, innovative technologies have been developed. Assessment of macular region status after the use of routine and innovative phaco technologies is of great interest. 

Aim: To compare effects of different phaco technologies on macular retina, visual acuity and intraocular pressure in patients with compensated glaucoma after uncomplicated phaco with intraocular lens implantation. 

Materials and methods: Phacoemulsification of immature cataract was performed in 52  patients (52 eyes) using Oertli machine and uniform method. Patients were divided into 3 groups. Group 1 included 20  patients (20  eyes) with simple (primary) openangle glaucoma (POAG) after phaco using easyPhaco technology. Group 2 included 20  POAG patients (20  eyes) after phaco using routine technology. Group  3 included 12  patients without glaucoma after routine phaco. EasyPhaco technology involves using of the new Oertli machine parameters, phaco tip with new geometry, flow rate/vacuum setting of 1:10. Preoperatively, in all 40 patients with glaucoma, normal values of intraocular pressure were achieved using antiglaucomatous therapies. Visual acuity, intraocular pressure and macular thickness by optical coherent tomography were measured before the surgery, in 1 and 6 weeks after the procedure.

 Results: Increase of macular thickness (by 12–30  mcm compared to baseline) was observed postoperatively in patients with and without glaucoma. After 1 week, mean macular thickness was significantly less in the easyPhaco group compared to routine phaco groups with and without glaucoma (221.5±15.4;238.3 ± 11.5 and 229.3 ± 16.9 mcm,respectively, p < 0.05). In the groups 1 and 3, macular thickness returned to preoperative values after 6 weeks (group 1: 210.5 ± 13.8 and 209.7 ± 16.3 mcm; group  3: 211.1 ± 14.4 and 211.1 ± 15.8  mcm,respectively). By contrast, after routine phaco technology in POAG patients, macular edema persisted after 6  weeks (mean macular thickness 228.2 ± 13.5  mcm compared to 208.2 ± 17.6  mcm preoperatively). 

Conclusion: In patients with glaucoma, use of easyPhaco technology is associated with less effects on the retina and less risk of macular edema after the surgery.

 

About the authors

E. N. Mityaeva

Mytishchi City Clinical Hospital

Author for correspondence.
Email: mityaevadoc@mail.ru
Ophthalmologist, the Head of the Ophthalmology Department Россия

I. A. Loskutov

Eye Microsurgery Center of the NonGovernmental Healthcare Institution “N.A. Semashko Railroad Hospital”

Email: fake@neicon.ru

MD, PhD, Chief

Россия

References

  1. Nussenblatt RB, Kaufman SC, Palestine AG, Davis MD, Ferris FL 3rd . Macular thickening and visual acuity. Measurement in patients with cystoid macular edema. Ophthalmology.1987;94(9):1134–9.
  2. Squirrell D, Bhola R, Bush J, Winder S, Talbot JF. A prospective, case controlled study of the natural history of diabetic retinopathy and maculopathy after uncomplicated phacoemulsification cataract surgery in patients with type 2 diabetes. Br J Ophthalmol. 2002;86(5):565–71.
  3. Liu Y, Zeng M, Liu X, Luo L, Yuan Z, Xia Y, Zeng Y.Torsional mode versus conventional ultrasound mode phacoemulsification: randomized comparative clinical study. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2007;33(2):287–92.
  4. Nunes S, Pereira I, Santos A, Bernardes R, Cunha-Vaz J. Central retinal thickness measured with HD-OCT shows
  5. a weak correlation with visual acuity in eyes with CSME. Br J Ophthalmol. 2010;94(9):1201–4.
  6. Lima MC, Paranhos A Jr, Salim S, Honkanen R, Devgan L, Wand M, Gaudio AR, Shields MB. Visually significant cystoid macular edema in pseudophakic and aphakic patients with glaucoma receiving latanoprost. J Glaucoma. 2000;9(4):317–21.
  7. Park SH, Choi CY, Kim JM, Chang HR, Kim JY, Kim MJ, Tchah H, Kim JC. Comparison of actual vacuum pressures at the end of 3 phacoemulsification tips in swine eyes. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009;35(5):917–20.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2015 Mityaeva E.N., Loskutov I.A.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies