<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE root>
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" article-type="review-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Almanac of Clinical Medicine</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="en">Almanac of Clinical Medicine</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Альманах клинической медицины</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="print">2072-0505</issn><issn publication-format="electronic">2587-9294</issn><publisher><publisher-name xml:lang="en">Moscow Regional Research and Clinical Institute (MONIKI)</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">12064</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.18786/2072-0505-2023-51-030</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>REVIEW ARTICLE</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>ОБЗОР</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="article-type"><subject>Review Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title xml:lang="en">Diagnostic algorithms for acute ankle injury imaging</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Алгоритмы лучевой диагностики при острой травме голеностопного сустава</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1611-5000</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Trufanov</surname><given-names>Gennadii E.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Труфанов</surname><given-names>Геннадий Евгеньевич</given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="RU">Russian Federation</country></address><bio xml:lang="en"><p>MD, PhD, Professor. Chief Research Fellow, Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Chair of Diagnostic Radiology and Medical Imaging, Institute of Medical Education</p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>д-р мед. наук, профессор, гл. науч. сотр. научно-исследовательского отдела лучевой диагностики, заведующий кафедрой лучевой диагностики и медицинской визуализации Института медицинского образования</p></bio><email>trufanovge@mail.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3806-2456</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Aleksandrovich</surname><given-names>Viktoria Y.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Александрович</surname><given-names>Виктория Юрьевна</given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="RU">Russian Federation</country></address><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Roentgenologist, Department of Magnetic Resonance Imaging</p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>врач-рентгенолог отделения магнитно-резонансной томографии</p></bio><email>va96@bk.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4848-4628</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Menkova</surname><given-names>Irina S.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Менькова</surname><given-names>Ирина Сергеевна</given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="RU">Russian Federation</country></address><bio xml:lang="en"><p>MD, PhD, Assistant Professor, Chair of Diagnostic Radiology and Medical Imaging, Institute of Medical Education; Head of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Unit</p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>канд. мед. наук, ассистент кафедры лучевой диагностики и медицинской визуализации Института медицинского образования, заведующая кабинетом магнитно-резонансной томографии</p></bio><email>irina.s.menkova@gmail.com</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff1"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">Almazov National Medical Research Centre</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">ФГБУ «Национальный медицинский исследовательский центр им. В.А. Алмазова» Минздрава России</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><aff-alternatives id="aff2"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">Mariinsky City Hospital</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">СПб ГБУЗ «Городская Мариинская больница»</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><aff-alternatives id="aff3"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">St. Olga's Pediatric City Hospital</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">СПб ГБУЗ «Детская городская больница Святой Ольги»</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date date-type="preprint" iso-8601-date="2023-10-17" publication-format="electronic"><day>17</day><month>10</month><year>2023</year></pub-date><pub-date date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2023-11-17" publication-format="electronic"><day>17</day><month>11</month><year>2023</year></pub-date><volume>51</volume><issue>5</issue><issue-title xml:lang="en"/><issue-title xml:lang="ru"/><fpage>301</fpage><lpage>313</lpage><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2023-05-29"><day>29</day><month>05</month><year>2023</year></date><date date-type="accepted" iso-8601-date="2023-09-27"><day>27</day><month>09</month><year>2023</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement xml:lang="en">Copyright ©; 2023, Trufanov G.E., Aleksandrovich V.Y., Menkova I.S.</copyright-statement><copyright-statement xml:lang="ru">Copyright ©; 2023, Труфанов Г.Е., Александрович В.Ю., Менькова И.С.</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2023</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Trufanov G.E., Aleksandrovich V.Y., Menkova I.S.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Труфанов Г.Е., Александрович В.Ю., Менькова И.С.</copyright-holder><ali:free_to_read xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/"/><license><ali:license_ref xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0</ali:license_ref></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://almclinmed.ru/jour/article/view/12064">https://almclinmed.ru/jour/article/view/12064</self-uri><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>Ankle trauma is the most prevalent low extremity injury among urgent referral patients. Up to 85% of acute ankle traumas lead to an isolated ligament injury, with up to 50% of these patients would have chronic pain syndrome in the future, related to inaccurate diagnosis and resulting inappropriate treatment strategy and rehabilitation term.</p> <p>We analyzed publications on the state-of-the-art aspects of radiation diagnostics of acute ankle injury available from PubMed/MEDLINE databases and in the Russian Index of Scientific Citation (Elibrary.ru) for the last ten years; some earlier essential publications on certain aspects were also considered.</p> <p>Up to now, there have been no unified guidelines on the radiation diagnosis of ankle injury depending on the trauma type, mechanism, and severity. The Ottawa ankle rules (1994) are the basic guidelines for selection of the patients with acute trauma who should be offered X-rays. Primary X-ray would allow for the choice of the treatment strategy or further diagnostic assessment of the patient. Computed tomography is done for multi-fragment intra-articular fractures and for the control after their reposition. Computed tomography is used in patients with severe pain syndrome and other absolute and relative contraindications for magnetic resonance imaging. The latter allows for the imaging of all injured structures within a single assessment procedure and by such to make the diagnosis of ligament and tendon ruptures, to visualize osteochondral injuries, hidden and stress fractures and many other acute ankle injuries. Ultrasound assessment can considerably add to clinical understanding of the patient during acute trauma, if magnetic resonance imaging is contraindicated.</p> <p>Based on the analysis performed, we propose the algorithms for diagnostic assessment in various clinical situations.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>Травмы голеностопного сустава – наиболее распространенное повреждение нижней конечности среди пострадавших, обращающихся за неотложной помощью. До 85% острых травм голеностопного сустава приводит к изолированному повреждению связок, при этом до 50% таких пациентов в будущем страдают хроническим болевым синдромом, что может быть связано с неточной диагностикой и вследствие этого неадекватной тактикой лечения и сроками реабилитации.</p> <p>В реферативных базах данных PubMed/MEDLINE и Российском индексе научного цитирования (Elibrary.ru) проведен анализ публикаций, доступных за последние 10 лет и освещающих современные аспекты лучевой диагностики острых травматических повреждений голеностопного сустава; по отдельным позициям рассмотрены основополагающие труды более раннего периода.</p> <p>До настоящего времени не существует единых рекомендаций по использованию лучевых методов диагностики травматического повреждения голеностопного сустава в зависимости от вида, механизма и тяжести травмы. В определении показаний для назначения рентгенографии пациентам с острым травматическим повреждением первостепенную роль играют Оттавские правила голеностопного сустава (1994). Первичная рентгенография позволяет определить тактику лечения либо дальнейшего дообследования пациента. Компьютерная томография выполняется при многооскольчатых внутрисуставных переломах и для контроля после репозиции. Компьютерно-томографическое исследование применяют у пациентов с выраженным болевым синдромом и другими абсолютными и относительными противопоказаниями для выполнения магнитно-резонансной томографии. Последняя позволяет в процессе одного исследования визуализировать все структуры пораженной области, а следовательно – диагностировать разрывы связок, сухожилий, визуализировать остеохондральные повреждения, скрытые, стрессовые переломы и многие другие острые травматические повреждения голеностопного сустава. Ультразвуковое исследование во многом дополняет клиническое представление о пациенте в период острой травмы при наличии противопоказаний к проведению магнитно-резонансной томографии.</p> <p>На основании проведенного анализа предложены алгоритмы диагностического обследования при различных клинических ситуациях.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>ankle</kwd><kwd>acute injury</kwd><kwd>fracture</kwd><kwd>Ottawa ankle rules</kwd><kwd>sprain</kwd><kwd>radiography</kwd><kwd>magnetic resonance imaging</kwd><kwd>computed tomography</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>голеностопный сустав</kwd><kwd>острая травма</kwd><kwd>перелом</kwd><kwd>Оттавские правила голеностопного сустава</kwd><kwd>растяжение связок</kwd><kwd>рентгенография</kwd><kwd>магнитно-резонансная томография</kwd><kwd>компьютерная томография</kwd></kwd-group><funding-group/></article-meta></front><body></body><back><ref-list><ref id="B1"><label>1.</label><mixed-citation>Czajka CM, Tran E, Cai AN, DiPreta JA. Ankle sprains and instability. Med Clin North Am. 2014;98(2):313–329. doi: 10.1016/j.mcna.2013.11.003.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><label>2.</label><mixed-citation>Lambers K, Ootes D, Ring D. Incidence of patients with lower extremity injuries presenting to US emergency departments by anatomic region, disease category, and age. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012;470(1):284–290. doi: 10.1007/s11999-011-1982-z.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><label>3.</label><mixed-citation>Здравоохранение в России: статистический сборник [Интернет]. М.; 2021. 171 с. Доступно на: https://rosstat.gov.ru/storage/mediabank/Zdravoohran-2021.pdf.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><label>4.</label><mixed-citation>United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics. National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 2016 Emergency Department Summary Tables [Internet]. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhamcs/web_tables/2016_ed_web_tables.pdf.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><label>5.</label><mixed-citation>Kemler E, van de Port I, Valkenberg H, Hoes AW, Backx FJ. Ankle injuries in the Netherlands: Trends over 10-25 years. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2015;25(3):331–337. doi: 10.1111/sms.12248.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><label>6.</label><mixed-citation>Bridgman SA, Clement D, Downing A, Walley G, Phair I, Maffulli N. Population based epidemiology of ankle sprains attending accident and emergency units in the West Midlands of England, and a survey of UK practice for severe ankle sprains. Emerg Med J. 2003;20(6):508–510. doi: 10.1136/emj.20.6.508.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><label>7.</label><mixed-citation>Halabchi F, Hassabi M. Acute ankle sprain in athletes: Clinical aspects and algorithmic approach. World J Orthop. 2020;11(12):534–558. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v11.i12.534.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><label>8.</label><mixed-citation>Dowling S, Spooner CH, Liang Y, Dryden DM, Friesen C, Klassen TP, Wright RB. Accuracy of Ottawa Ankle Rules to exclude fractures of the ankle and midfoot in children: a meta-analysis. Acad Emerg Med. 2009;16(4):277–287. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2008.00333.x.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><label>9.</label><mixed-citation>Jonckheer P, Willems T, De Ridder R, Paulus D, Holdt Henningsen K, San Miguel L, De Sutter A, Roosen P. Evaluating fracture risk in acute ankle sprains: Any news since the Ottawa Ankle Rules? A systematic review. Eur J Gen Pract. 2016;22(1):31–41. doi: 10.3109/13814788.2015.1102881.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B10"><label>10.</label><mixed-citation>Gaddi D, Mosca A, Piatti M, Munegato D, Catalano M, Di Lorenzo G, Turati M, Zanchi N, Piscitelli D, Chui K, Zatti G, Bigoni M. Acute Ankle Sprain Management: An Umbrella Review of Systematic Reviews. Front Med (Lausanne). 2022;9:868474. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.868474.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B11"><label>11.</label><mixed-citation>Barini M, Zagaria D, Licandro D, Pansini S, Airoldi C, Leigheb M, Carriero A. Magnetic Resonance Accuracy in the Diagnosis of Anterior Talo-Fibular Ligament Acute Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Diagnostics (Basel). 2021;11(10):1782. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11101782.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B12"><label>12.</label><mixed-citation>Al-Mohrej OA, Al-Kenani NS. Chronic ankle instability: Current perspectives. Avicenna J Med. 2016;6(4):103–108. doi: 10.4103/2231-0770.191446.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B13"><label>13.</label><mixed-citation>Ribbans WJ, Garde A. Tibialis posterior tendon and deltoid and spring ligament injuries in the elite athlete. Foot Ankle Clin. 2013;18(2):255–291. doi: 10.1016/j.fcl.2013.02.006.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B14"><label>14.</label><mixed-citation>Lötscher P, Lang TH, Zwicky L, Hintermann B, Knupp M. Osteoligamentous injuries of the medial ankle joint. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2015;41(6):615–621. doi: 10.1007/s00068-015-0548-2.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B15"><label>15.</label><mixed-citation>Altomare D, Fusco G, Bertolino E, Ranieri R, Sconza C, Lipina M, Kon E, Marcacci M, Bianchini L, Di Matteo B. Evidence-based treatment choices for acute lateral ankle sprain: a comprehensive systematic review. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2022;26(6):1876–1884. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_202203_28333.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B16"><label>16.</label><mixed-citation>Vuurberg G, Hoorntje A, Wink LM, van der Doelen BFW, van den Bekerom MP, Dekker R, van Dijk CN, Krips R, Loogman MCM, Ridderikhof ML, Smithuis FF, Stufkens SAS, Verhagen EALM, de Bie RA, Kerkhoffs GMMJ. Diagnosis, treatment and prevention of ankle sprains: update of an evidence-based clinical guideline. Br J Sports Med. 2018;52(15):956. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2017-098106.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B17"><label>17.</label><mixed-citation>Wang DY, Jiao C, Ao YF, Yu JK, Guo QW, Xie X, Chen LX, Zhao F, Pi YB, Li N, Hu YL, Jiang D. Risk Factors for Osteochondral Lesions and Osteophytes in Chronic Lateral Ankle Instability: A Case Series of 1169 Patients. Orthop J Sports Med. 2020;8(5):2325967120922821. doi: 10.1177/2325967120922821.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B18"><label>18.</label><mixed-citation>Black EM, Antoci V, Lee JT, Weaver MJ, Johnson AH, Susarla SM, Kwon JY. Role of preoperative computed tomography scans in operative planning for malleolar ankle fractures. Foot Ankle Int. 2013;34(5):697–704. doi: 10.1177/1071100713475355.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B19"><label>19.</label><mixed-citation>Kumar A, Mishra P, Tandon A, Arora R, Chadha M. Effect of CT on Management Plan in Malleolar Ankle Fractures. Foot Ankle Int. 2018;39(1):59–66. doi: 10.1177/1071100717732746.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B20"><label>20.</label><mixed-citation>Stiell IG, McKnight RD, Greenberg GH, McDowell I, Nair RC, Wells GA, Johns C, Worthington JR. Implementation of the Ottawa ankle rules. JAMA. 1994;271(11):827–832.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B21"><label>21.</label><mixed-citation>Strudwick K, McPhee M, Bell A, Martin-Khan M, Russell T. Review article: Best practice management of common ankle and foot injuries in the emergency department (part 2 of the musculoskeletal injuries rapid review series). Emerg Med Australas. 2018;30(2):152–180. doi: 10.1111/1742-6723.12904.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B22"><label>22.</label><mixed-citation>Lavrador Filho JM, Vogt PH, Coelho ARR, Cho DK, da Silva JLV, Padoani PW. Application of the Ottawa Protocol by Medical Students and Orthopedic Residents on Ankle Sprains at a Trauma Hospital. Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo). 2020;55(5):620–624. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1702957.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B23"><label>23.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Trufanov GE, Pchelin IG, Pashnikova IS. [Diagnostic imaging of ankle joint and foot injuries (Radiation diagnostician's notes)]. 3rd ed. Saint Petersburg: ELBI-SPb; 2021. 368 p. Russian.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Труфанов ГЕ, Пчелин ИГ, Пашникова ИС. Лучевая диагностика повреждений голеностопного сустава и стопы (Конспект лучевого диагноста). 3-е изд. СПб.: ЭЛБИ-СПб; 2021. 368 с.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B24"><label>24.</label><mixed-citation>American College of Radiology. ACR Appropriateness Criteria “Acute Trauma to the Ankle” [Internet]. 27 Mar 2020. Available from: https://acsearch.acr.org/docs/69436/Narrative/.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B25"><label>25.</label><mixed-citation>Allen GM, Wilson DJ, Bullock SA, Watson M. Extremity CT and ultrasound in the assessment of ankle injuries: occult fractures and ligament injuries. Br J Radiol. 2020;93(1105):20180989. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20180989.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B26"><label>26.</label><mixed-citation>Sofka CM. Technical Considerations: Best Practices for MR Imaging of the Foot and Ankle. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 2017;25(1):1–10. doi: 10.1016/j.mric.2016.08.001.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B27"><label>27.</label><mixed-citation>Polzer H, Kanz KG, Prall WC, Haasters F, Ockert B, Mutschler W, Grote S. Diagnosis and treatment of acute ankle injuries: development of an evidence-based algorithm. Orthop Rev (Pavia). 2012;4(1):e5. doi: 10.4081/or.2012.e5.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B28"><label>28.</label><mixed-citation>Wilson MP, Nobbee D, Murad MH, Dhillon S, McInnes MDF, Katlariwala P, Low G. Diagnostic Accuracy of Limited MRI Protocols for Detecting Radiographically Occult Hip Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2020;215(3):559–567. doi: 10.2214/AJR.19.22676.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B29"><label>29.</label><mixed-citation>Seok H, Lee SH, Yun SJ. Diagnostic performance of ankle ultrasound for diagnosing anterior talofibular and calcaneofibular ligament injuries: a meta-analysis. Acta Radiol. 2020;61(5):651–661. doi: 10.1177/0284185119873119.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B30"><label>30.</label><mixed-citation>Lee SH, Yun SJ. Ankle ultrasound for detecting anterior talofibular ligament tear using operative finding as reference standard: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2020;46(1):73–81. doi: 10.1007/s00068-019-01169-3.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B31"><label>31.</label><mixed-citation>Esmailian M, Ataie M, Ahmadi O, Rastegar S, Adibi A. Sensitivity and specificity of ultrasound in the diagnosis of traumatic ankle injury. J Res Med Sci. 2021;26:14. doi: 10.4103/jrms.JRMS_264_20.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B32"><label>32.</label><mixed-citation>Verhagen RA, Maas M, Dijkgraaf MG, Tol JL, Krips R, van Dijk CN. Prospective study on diagnostic strategies in osteochondral lesions of the talus. Is MRI superior to helical CT? J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005;87(1):41–46.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B33"><label>33.</label><mixed-citation>Bachmann LM, Kolb E, Koller MT, Steurer J, ter Riet G. Accuracy of Ottawa ankle rules to exclude fractures of the ankle and mid-foot: systematic review. BMJ. 2003;326(7386):417. doi: 10.1136/bmj.326.7386.417.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B34"><label>34.</label><mixed-citation>Weierich K, Minor M, Bui-Mansfield LT. Systematic Approach to the Radiographic Interpretation of the Ankle and Foot Using a Checklist Approach to Avoid Common Diagnostic Errors. Contemporary Diagnostic Radiology. 2020;43(19):1–7.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B35"><label>35.</label><mixed-citation>Lampridis V, Gougoulias N, Sakellariou A. Stability in ankle fractures: Diagnosis and treatment. EFORT Open Rev. 2018;3(5):294–303. doi: 10.1302/2058-5241.3.170057.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B36"><label>36.</label><mixed-citation>Pao DG, Keats TE, Dussault RG. Avulsion fracture of the base of the fifth metatarsal not seen on conventional radiography of the foot: the need for an additional projection. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000;175(2):549–552. doi: 10.2214/ajr.175.2.1750549.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B37"><label>37.</label><mixed-citation>Schottel PC, Fabricant PD, Berkes MB, Garner MR, Little MT, Hentel KD, Mintz DN, Helfet DL, Lorich DG. Manual Stress Ankle Radiography Has Poor Ability to Predict Deep Deltoid Ligament Integrity in a Supination External Rotation Fracture Cohort. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2015;54(4):531–535. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2014.07.007.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B38"><label>38.</label><mixed-citation>Lau BC, Allahabadi S, Palanca A, Oji DE. Understanding Radiographic Measurements Used in Foot and Ankle Surgery. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2022;30(2):e139–e154. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-20-00189.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B39"><label>39.</label><mixed-citation>Ng N, Onggo JR, Nambiar M, Maingard JT, Ng D, Gupta G, Nandurkar D, Babazadeh S, Bedi H. Which test is the best? An updated literature review of imaging modalities for acute ankle diastasis injuries. J Med Radiat Sci. 2022;69(3):382–393. doi: 10.1002/jmrs.589.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B40"><label>40.</label><mixed-citation>Gibson PD, Ippolito JA, Hwang JS, Didesch J, Koury KL, Reilly MC, Adams M, Sirkin M. Physiologic widening of the medial clear space: What's normal? J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2019;10(Suppl 1):S62–S64. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2019.04.016.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B41"><label>41.</label><mixed-citation>van Leeuwen C, Haak T, Kop M, Weil N, Zijta F, Hoogendoorn J. The additional value of gravity stress radiographs in predicting deep deltoid ligament integrity in supination external rotation ankle fractures. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2019;45(4):727–735. doi: 10.1007/s00068-018-0923-x.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B42"><label>42.</label><mixed-citation>Park SH, Lee HS, Young KW, Seo SG. Treatment of Acute Achilles Tendon Rupture. Clin Orthop Surg. 2020;12(1):1–8. doi: 10.4055/cios.2020.12.1.1.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B43"><label>43.</label><mixed-citation>Schwartz AM, Runge WO, Hsu AR, Bariteau JT. Fractures of the Talus: Current Concepts. Foot Ankle Orthop. 2020;5(1):2473011419900766. doi: 10.1177/2473011419900766.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B44"><label>44.</label><mixed-citation>Avci M, Kozaci N, Yuksel S, Etli I, Yilmaz Y. Comparison of radiography and computed tomography in emergency department evaluation of ankle trauma. Annals of Medical Research. 2019;26(5):867–872. doi: 10.5455/annalsmedres.2019.01.050.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B45"><label>45.</label><mixed-citation>Bouche PA, Gaujac N, Corsia S, Leclerc P, Anract P, Auberger G. Ankle CT scan allows better management of posterior malleolus fractures than X-rays. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2022;32(7):1301–1309. doi: 10.1007/s00590-021-03104-y.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B46"><label>46.</label><mixed-citation>Dale JD, Ha AS, Chew FS. Update on talar fracture patterns: a large level I trauma center study. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013;201(5):1087–1092. doi: 10.2214/AJR.12.9918.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B47"><label>47.</label><mixed-citation>Krähenbühl N, Weinberg MW, Davidson NP, Mills MK, Hintermann B, Saltzman CL, Barg A. Imaging in syndesmotic injury: a systematic literature review. Skeletal Radiol. 2018;47(5):631–648. doi: 10.1007/s00256-017-2823-2.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B48"><label>48.</label><mixed-citation>Paredes-Vázquez R, Sesma-Villalpando RA, Herrera-Tenorio G, Romero-Ogawa T. Evaluación por tomografía computarizada de diastasis de la sindesmosis en fracturas de tobillo tipo B y C de AO/OTA [CT scan evaluation of the syndesmotic diastasis in AO/OTA B and C ankle fractures]. Acta Ortop Mex. 2011;25(1):32–38. Spanish.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B49"><label>49.</label><mixed-citation>Chun DI, Cho JH, Min TH, Park SY, Kim KH, Kim JH, Won SH. Diagnostic Accuracy of Radiologic Methods for Ankle Syndesmosis Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Clin Med. 2019;8(7):968. doi: 10.3390/jcm8070968.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B50"><label>50.</label><mixed-citation>Szymański T, Zdanowicz U. Comparison of routine computed tomography and plain X-ray imaging for malleolar fractures – How much do we miss? Foot Ankle Surg. 2022;28(2):263–268. doi: 10.1016/j.fas.2021.03.025.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B51"><label>51.</label><mixed-citation>Anazor F, Sibanda V, Abubakar A, Dhinsa BS. Computed Tomography Scan Architectural Measurements in Adult Foot and Ankle Surgery: A Narrative Review for Orthopaedic Trainees. Cureus. 2022;14(11):e32039. doi: 10.7759/cureus.32039.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B52"><label>52.</label><mixed-citation>Tan DW, Teh DJW, Chee YH. Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging in diagnosing lateral ankle ligament injuries: A comparative study with surgical findings and timings of scans. Asia Pac J Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Technol. 2016;7:15–20. doi: 10.1016/j.asmart.2016.09.003.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B53"><label>53.</label><mixed-citation>Haubro M, Stougaard C, Torfing T, Overgaard S. Sensitivity and specificity of CT- and MRI-scanning in evaluation of occult fracture of the proximal femur. Injury. 2015;46(8):1557–1561. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2015.05.006.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B54"><label>54.</label><mixed-citation>Wright AA, Hegedus EJ, Lenchik L, Kuhn KJ, Santiago L, Smoliga JM. Diagnostic Accuracy of Various Imaging Modalities for Suspected Lower Extremity Stress Fractures: A Systematic Review With Evidence-Based Recommendations for Clinical Practice. Am J Sports Med. 2016;44(1):255–263. doi: 10.1177/0363546515574066.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B55"><label>55.</label><mixed-citation>Crim J, Longenecker LG. MRI and surgical findings in deltoid ligament tears. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015;204(1):W63–69. doi: 10.2214/AJR.13.11702.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B56"><label>56.</label><mixed-citation>European Society of Skeletal Radiology Sports Sub-committee. Guidelines for MR Imaging of Sports Injuries [Internet]. 2016. Available from: https://essr.org/content-essr/uploads/2016/10/ESSR-MRI-Protocols-Ankle.pdf.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B57"><label>57.</label><mixed-citation>Jesse MK, Hunt KJ, Strickland C. Postoperative Imaging of the Ankle. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2018;211(3):496–505. doi: 10.2214/AJR.18.19600.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B58"><label>58.</label><mixed-citation>El-Liethy N, Kamal H. High resolution ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of tendino-ligamentous injuries around ankle joint. The Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine. 2016;47(2):543–555. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrnm.2016.02.009.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B59"><label>59.</label><mixed-citation>Delzell PB, Tritle BA, Bullen JA, Chiunda S, Forney MC. Clinical Utility of High-Frequency Musculoskeletal Ultrasonography in Foot and Ankle Pathology: How Ultrasound Imaging Influences Diagnosis and Management. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2017;56(4):735–739. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2017.01.052.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B60"><label>60.</label><mixed-citation>Singh K, Thukral CL, Gupta K, Singh A. Comparison of high resolution ultrasonography with clinical findings in patients with ankle pain. J Ultrason. 2018;18(75):316–324. doi: 10.15557/JoU.2018.0046.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B61"><label>61.</label><mixed-citation>Ergün T, Peker A, Aybay MN, Turan K, Muratoğlu OG, Çabuk H. Ultrasonography vıew for acute ankle ınjury: comparison of ultrasonography and magnetic resonance ımaging. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023;143(3):1531–1536. doi: 10.1007/s00402-022-04553-8.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B62"><label>62.</label><mixed-citation>Rosa I, Rodeia J, Fernandes PX, Teixeira R, Saldanha T, Consciência JG. Ultrasonographic Assessment of Deltoid Ligament Integrity in Ankle Fractures. Foot Ankle Int. 2020;41(2):147–153. doi: 10.1177/1071100719882679.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
